The aim of Wellington’s bike network plan is to create a citywide network of connected bike routes to improve safety for people on bikes, increase the role of cycling in the transport network, and improve environmental and health outcomes. At the same time, we look to make improvements for people who walk and take the bus.
Our transport planners developed a long list of possible options for how we could improve the busy route from Berhampore to Newtown, looking at things from a range of perspectives, thinking about all the possibilities and what could be achieved in line with best practice and national guidelines.
Plans have been reviewed by various internal and external stakeholders, including Waka Kotahi, Greater Wellington Regional Council, and cycling, walking and accessibility representatives.
As well as safety and comfort for people walking, riding, or taking the bus, we also considered street and vehicle widths, intersections, impacts of lower speeds, loading and servicing for businesses, and the effects on parking availability. Options not progressed to the short list included using other routes, removing building verandahs, and widening streets by digging up kerbs.
There were five options for this section:
Option 1: separated bike lanes on both sides of the street, removing all parking
Option 2: on-road bike lanes on both sides, a wider northbound bus lane, removing all parking
Option 3: separated southbound bike lanes, shared bike/bus lane northbound, wider traffic lanes, removing all parking
Option 4: shared lanes in both directions, parking on one side, traffic calming, reduced speed environment, wider traffic lanes
Option 5: separated bike lanes in both directions, wider traffic lanes, remove all parking.
Option 5 scored the highest however we have gone with option 3 (the second-highest scoring option) to minimise the wider network effects on traffic and buses. The shared bus/bike lane approach works as a transition from the shared lane in Rintoul Street and the bus lane and bike lane in the next block of Riddiford Street. Although it would have been ideal to separate the northbound bike lane, the street is not wide enough here to achieve this while maintaining adequate space in the traffic lanes and space for bus users.
There were four options for this section:
Option 1: separated southbound uphill bike lane, shared northbound downhill traffic lane, no parking, increased traffic lane widths
Option 2: separated southbound uphill bike lane, shared northbound downhill traffic lane, parking on the western side
Option 3: on-road southbound uphill bike lane, shared northbound downhill traffic lane, parking on the western side
Option 4: on-road bike lanes in both directions, no parking, increased traffic lane widths.
Option 1 received the highest score in the MCA however based on the feedback received at this point, we went with option 3 for the 30% design, endeavouring to balance bus, bike, traffic lane widths, and parking requirements in a constrained space. Feedback on the 30% design showed there would be inadequate protection for people on bikes and it would not adequately encourage more people to cycle and keep them safe, particularly school students. Option 2 received the second highest score and retained some parking, so this option was developed to 90% design.
Other considerations included:
There were five options for this section:
Option 1: shared southbound downhill traffic lane, separated northbound uphill bike lane, no parking, increased traffic lane widths
Option 2: shared southbound downhill traffic lane, separated northbound uphill bike lane, parking on the eastern side
Option 3: shared traffic lanes in both directions, traffic calming, 30km/h speed environment, parking on both sides
Option 4: on-road southbound downhill bike lane, separated northbound uphill bike lane, no parking
Option 5: shared southbound downhill traffic lane, separated northbound uphill bike lane, parking on the eastern side.
Option 1 received the highest score however based on the feedback received at this point we went with option 2 for the 30% design, endeavouring to balance bus, bike, traffic lane widths, and parking requirements in a constrained space. Feedback on the 30% design showed there would be inadequate protection for people on bikes and it would not adequately encourage more people to cycle and keep them safe, particularly school students. Option 5 received the third highest score in the MCA and retained some parking, so this option was developed to 90% design.
Other considerations included:
There were three options:
Option 1: separated two-way bike lane, parking on one side of the street
Option 2: shared traffic lane towards Adelaide Road, separated bike lane towards the city, parking on both sides
Option 3: shared traffic lanes in both directions, traffic calming and planting, 30km/h speed environment, parking on both sides.
Option 1 received the highest score and feedback confirmed this as the preferred option to progress to 30% design. Luxford Street is wide enough to accommodate separated bike lanes and retain some parking.
Other considerations included:
There were two options for this section at the Berhampore shops:
Option 1: shared southbound traffic lane, separated northbound bike lane, indented parking on the eastern side, reinforce 30km/h speed environment
Option 2: shared traffic lanes in both directions, traffic calming, 30km/h speed environment, raised pedestrian crossings, parking on both sides (a clearway on the western side, indented parking on the eastern side).
Option 2 scored the highest and is the one we selected.
Other considerations included:
There were four options for this section:
Option 1: shared southbound traffic lane, separated northbound bike lane, remove all parking, increased traffic lane widths
Option 2: southbound bike lane, separated northbound bike lane, remove all parking, increased traffic lane widths
Option 3: separated bike lanes in both directions, remove all parking
Option 4: shared southbound downhill traffic lane, separated northbound uphill bike lane, parking on the eastern side.
Options 2 and 3 rated the highest however we selected a combination depending on the gradient of the road. These options provide a consistent protected cycle route for people heading towards the city, with continuity from the existing bike lanes on The Parade through to Berhampore, for this busy route that already has high cycle usage and high potential for more.
Other considerations included:
There were three options for this section:
Option 1: southbound bike lane, separated northbound bike lane, parking on the western side
Option 2: shared southbound downhill traffic lane, separated northbound uphill bike lane, parking on both sides, reduced traffic lane widths
Option 3: bike lanes in both directions, parking on the western side.
Option 1 received the highest score however we decided to proceed with option 2 to 30% design because of the importance of the regional sports centre at Wakefield Park and consistency with designs on similar corridors in Wellington.
Other considerations included:
For full details you can read the options considered and multicriteria analysis.